Acceptable-use policy
Practical rules for approved tools, data, human review, escalation and prohibited uses.
AI GOVERNANCE
Create governance employees can follow and management can use to approve tools, assess new use cases and control data risk.
WHAT THIS HELPS SOLVE
Employees need practical boundaries on approved tools, sensitive data, prohibited use and when human review is required.
A repeatable process helps teams assess new AI tools and use cases without making every decision from scratch.
Governance clarifies who owns AI decisions, exceptions, supplier review and ongoing monitoring.
WHAT WE REVIEW
Practical rules for approved tools, data, human review, escalation and prohibited uses.
A maintained view of important AI tools, owners, purposes, suppliers and approval status.
A consistent way to review new AI use cases before adoption or expansion.
Clear expectations for confidential, personal, regulated or commercially sensitive information.
Accountability for approving tools, managing exceptions and reviewing material changes.
A proportionate cadence for revisiting tools, suppliers, policy and emerging business use cases.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE
Core policy and governance material tailored to the agreed scope.
A practical process for assessing new AI tools and use cases.
Clear responsibilities for approvals, exceptions and review.
Actions to move governance from documents into day-to-day working practices.
PROCESS
Understand the business context and agree what the engagement should cover.
Assess the agreed controls, practices, evidence and relevant technology.
Separate material issues from lower-value improvement opportunities.
Use the roadmap internally or ask ISTA to support the improvement work.
FAQ
It commonly covers approved tools, confidential information, personal data, intellectual property, human review, prohibited uses, incident reporting and accountability.
The frequency should reflect how quickly tools, suppliers and business use cases change. The important point is to assign ownership and a repeatable review cycle.
No. It spans security, data, technology, supplier, operational and management considerations. Specific legal or regulatory questions may require legal advice.
NEXT STEP
Tell us what is driving the review and we will discuss a sensible starting point.